1. فارسی

الف) مقالات

1. احمدی‌نژاد، مریم؛ امین‌الرعایا، یاسر (1398)، «تحلیل دکترین حاشیة انعطاف تفسیر در معاهدات غیر حقوق بشری با تأکید بر معاهدات تجاری و سرمایه‌گذاری»، مجلة حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 60.
2. ---------------------- (1395)، «ماهیت حقوقی دکترین حاشیة مجاز تفسیر»، فصلنامة سیاست خارجی، ش 30.
3. شریفی طرازکوهی حسین؛ مبینی، جواد (1393)، «دکترین حاشیة مجاز تفسیر در رویة دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر»، فصلنامة پژوهش حقوق عمومی، سال شانزدهم، ش 44 .
4. عبدی، ایوب؛ زمانی، سید قاسم ( 1396)، «حاشیة صلاحدید دولت‌ها در آزادی دین در پرتو رویة دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر»، پژوهش حقوق عمومی، ش 55.

2. انگلیسی
3. A) Books
4. Legg, A (2012), The Margin of Appreciation in international Human Right law, Deference and proportionality.
5. Raz.Y (1979), The Authority of Law, Oxford,Clarendon Press.
6. Yourow.C.H (1996), Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights, Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publisher.

1. B) Articles
2. Benvenisti, Eyal (1998), "Margin Of Appreciation, Consensus, And Universal Standards", New York University Journal of International Law And Politics ,Vol. 31, No.4.
3. Brauch, J.A, (2005), “The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law”, Columbia Journal of European Law,Vol.11, No.1.
4. Butler, Petra (2008), "Margin Of Appreciation – A Note Towards A Solution For The Pacific?" , Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, Vol.39, No.4
5. Greer, S, (2008), “What's Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly,Vol.80,No.4
6. Keller, P,(1998), “Re-thinking Ethnic and Cultural Rights in Europe”, 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.18, No.1
7. Macklem.P, (2006), "Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determination", International Journal of Constitutional Law,Vol.4, No.3.
8. Shany, Y,(2005), “Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?” European Journal of International Law , Vol.16, No.4
9. Shuibhne,N, (2009),"Margins of Appreciation: National Values, Fundamental Rights and EC Free Movement Law" European Law Review, Vol 32, No.2.
10. Wahlish, Martin (2014),"ECtHR Chamber Judgment Case Of S.A.S. V. France: Banning Of Burqas And Niqabs Legal?," Cambridge International Law Journal , available at: http://cjicl.org.uk/2014/07/21/echr-chamber-judgment-case-s-s-v-france-banning-burqas-niqabs-legal/

1. C) Cases
2. Campte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, ECtHR,1982,( Judgment of 23 June)
3. Case Concerning Oil Platforms Between Islamic Republic of Iran and United States of America,ICJ,2003,(Judgement of 6^th November)
4. Case of S.A.S. vs France, ECtHR,2014,(Judgement of 1^st July)
5. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom, ECtHR,1982,(Judgement of 22^nd October)
6. Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet ECJ,2007, (Judgement of 12 June)
7. Marckx v. Belgium, ECtHR,1979,(Judgment of 13^th June)
8. McGuiness v. United Kingdom, ECtHR ,1999,(Judgement of 8^th June)
9. Oberschlick v. Austria, ECtHR ,1994,(Judgement of 23^rd May 1991)
10. Omega Spielhallen und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn,ECJ,2004,(Judgement of 14^th October)
11. Schmidberger v Austria,ECJ, 2003,(Judgement of 12^th June)
12. Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, ECtHR ,2001,( Judgement of 2^nd October)
13. United Communist Party of Turkey and others v. Turkey, ECtHR, 1998,(Judgment of 30^th January)

1. D) Documents
2. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), (1950)
3. European Union(2004)EC Directive 2004/38/EC on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States

1. E) Opinions of Judges
2. Judge Buergenthal (2003), Separate Opinion on Oil platforms Case before ICJ
3. Judge Koojimans (2003)Separate Opinion on Oil platforms Case before ICJ