دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، گروه حقوق، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجفآباد، ایران.
2 استاد، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجفآباد، ایران. (گروه حقوق عمومی و بینالملل، دانشکدۀ معارف اسلامی و حقوق، دانشگاه امام صادق(ع))
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Since its establishment, the Administrative Justice Court has been the authority for adjudicating disputes arising from the exercise of public powers. It serves as a venue for the public to seek redress from the governing authorities in administrative matters. Based on Articles 170 and 173 of the Constitution, a judicial body has been established to address the grievances and complaints of citizens against government agencies and their officials. The ruling number 792 of the Supreme Court has recognized the right of the government to seek redress in the Administrative Justice Court. Following this judicial precedent, judges have focused on the fact that the government has the right to appeal against all rulings of quasi-judicial authorities. The main question of this paper is whether this ruling conflicts with the Constitution, fundamental principles of public law, and the principle of impartial trial. This paper, using a descriptive-analytical method, argues that this ruling, despite constitutional requirements, has challenged the understanding of the judicial system regarding the right of the public to seek redress, without regard to the fundamental principles of public law. The aforementioned ruling not only violates Article 173 of the Constitution but also has consequences, including the expansion of government authority and the limitation of citizens' rights and freedoms
کلیدواژهها English
الف) کتابها
ب) مقالات
